Use Case: Responsible AI in Financial Oversight (Research Paper)Record inserted or updated successfully.
AI & Data Analytics

Use Case: Responsible AI in Financial Oversight (Research Paper)

Author: CA. Shubhradeep Nandi

Watch on Youtube

Introduction

This use case demonstrates the practical deployment of Responsible AI in financial oversight, particularly in accounting, audit, tax, and governance. The focus is on embedding AI systems that enhance efficiency while ensuring compliance with ethical and privacy regulations such as India’s DPDP Act, GDPR, CCPA, and UAE data protection laws.

Problem Statement

Chartered Accountants (CAs) and audit professionals face increasing pressure to adopt AI-driven automation to improve efficiency and risk detection. However, they must balance this with the legal and ethical obligations to safeguard client data, ensure fairness, and maintain transparency and accountability in AI systems.

Solution

Two innovative approaches were developed to ensure privacy-preserving and compliant AI adoption in financial workflows:

1. Privacy-by-Design Architecture (Local LLM Stack)

- On-premises generative AI platform specifically for CA firms, ensuring ledger data never leaves the firewall.

- Modular, auditable pipeline with anomaly detection, narrative insights, and explainability dashboards.

- Achieved significant reductions in compliance breaches (e.g., consent-purpose mismatches from 77% to 7%).

- Fully compliant with India’s DPDP Act and global data privacy standards.

2. Cloak 1.0 (Privacy Shield for External LLMs)

- A plug-in that anonymises sensitive text before it reaches external LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini).

- Provides small to mid-tier CA firms with safe access to Gen-AI tools without data leakage risks.

- Integrates fairness and bias checks along with audit-trail explanations.

- Complies with localisation mandates and includes privacy-preserving techniques like Differential Privacy.

Benefits

- Faster insights and improved audit efficiency.

- Stronger compliance with global and regional data protection regulations.

- Increased trust from clients due to transparency and accountability mechanisms.

- Competitive advantage through verifiable Responsible AI deployment.

Recommendations

- Match solution to firm size: larger groups adopt local LLM stacks, smaller practices begin with Cloak 1.0.

- Embed fairness-transparency-accountability scorecards into every audit plan.

- Establish AI-Ethics Review Boards for governance and model validation.

- Automate KPI monitoring for continuous compliance improvement.

- Upskill practitioners in AI interpretability and privacy-preserving technologies.

Conclusion

By adopting either Privacy-by-Design architectures or Cloak 1.0, CA firms can convert generative AI risks into verifiable competitive advantages. This ensures faster audits, regulatory compliance, and stronger trust in AI-driven financial oversight.